Advocacy Project: Issue Overview

Introduction

• What is the issue/problem?

The amount of driving individuals do lead to air pollution, noise pollution and contribute greenhouse gases to the environment. Over the years the amount of driving has increased in the United States and cars grew bigger and less fuel efficient. Exhaust given off by combustible engines are toxic and contribute to climate change and global warming. Air pollution can effect human health, lead to diseases such as asthma. Global warming which is partly cause by carbon dioxide released from motor vehicles. Global warming is slowly changing fragile eco systems. The amount of oil used in the United States has increased dramatically over the years. A lot of oil is used to produced gas for cars. Oil is a precious resource but unfortunately it is non-renewable and not very clean.

One solution to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere is to have people drive less; this will also lower our dependency on oil. Mass transportation is a good alternative to driving individually and this bill offers free transit passes to employees in hopes to promote using cleaner ways of transportation to work.

• What current legislation has been proposed to address this? (Identify bill # and name)

H.R 3271 Green Routes to Work Act (Introduced into Houes Committees)

Who is affected by the issue?

Mass Transit, employers, employees, gas & oil production, car companies

• Who is affected the most?

employers who receive a tax credit for the companies and employees who are given free transit passes are affected the most.

• Who loses, and what do they lose?

Car companies may lose some business if large amount of people start to take public transportation. If people take mass transit they will not put as much wear and tear on their cars and they may need less repairs or find no need to buy a new one.

Oil and gas production would be affected because if people started taking mass transit there will less demand for gas.

• Who gains, and what do they gain?

Employers receive a tax credit for supplying employees with transit passes or for buying companies vehicles so employees can car pool. Employees are getting a service for free. They do not need to spend money on a car, as much on car maintenance, a transit pass, or gas. They also do not have to deal with the stress of driving in traffic. Mass transit will receive a large influx of business. They would make a lot of money from the large amount of new riders.

What are the consequences of the issue?

• For the individuals mostly affected?

Employees must make changes to their daily routine and schedule, it may take more time to get to work, there is not as much flexibility when taking public transportation. Also, it takes a lot of commitment to make this type of lifestyle change.

• For their families?

For families of employees they may find employees who now take mass transit not making it to commitments on time after work. On the flip side if one person takes mass transit thee family is saving money on gas and a car. They would not need as many family vehicles.

• For society?

There will be a cleaner, healthier environment if there is not as many cars on the roads. There would be not as much air or noise pollution. The roadways would not be congested with traffic. Mass transit would be more crowded and a little uncomfortable to ride if there is a large amount people on the bus or subways. This may discourage some from taking mass transit.

What is the economic impact of the issue?

• What are the economic costs of the issue, and who bears these costs?

There would be a less demand for cars and car sales may drop hurting an already struggling industry. The money for the tax credit has to come from somewhere..... Not as many individuals would be driving to work which would hurt the oil and gas industry because the demand would go down making the price of gas drop.

• What are the economic benefits of the issue, and who benefits?

Tax credits would cover the costs for employers to provide transit passes to employees. The large amount of transit passes purchased would pour money into this industry. Depending on how many receive the tax credit in the area and the amount new riders, transit may need to add more routes, more buses, and create jobs to handle the amount of large riders.

What is the social impact of the issue?

• What are the social costs of the issue, and who bears these costs?

Time- Employees may have a longer commute if they decide to take mass transit. They also may not be able to go straight to social events if they have to wait to take a bus home. Taking a bua or subway may not be as time efficient as taking their own car.

Comfort. Taking mass transit may not be as comfortable or private as taking their own car. Mass transit could be seen as dirty.

• What are the social benefits of the issue, and who benefits?

Less traffic. This will lead to less headache for commuters and possibly a quicker commute than if driving own car. Employees would benefit.

Employees may find new opportunities to meet new people while taking mass transit. Could be for networking if other professionals start taking the bus.

What are the barriers?

• What are the barriers to addressing this issue?

Employees may not want to give driving their own car. May think mass transit is not as efficient as driving own car. They may not car about environmental impact and continue to drive individually instead taking advantage of the free transit pass offered by employer.

In order for the transit passes for employees a tax credit needs to provided for employers; therefore money is barrier.

Finally, the amount of public transportation is a barrier. If a growing number a riders there may not be enough resources for all to be accommodated for. Also, some workplaces may not be easily accessible to transportation. It would make it difficult for employees to take mass transit to work. Mass transit may not offer routes outside if regular business hours; making it impossible for some to take the bus or subway to work.

• How can they be overcome?

Money will be provided through a tax credit. The money would come from the Low Greenhouse Gas Transportation Fund. This is already set up and money is regularly being deposited in it. It can be used if the secretary of the fund finds a suitable reason. This bill would fall into this category.

Transit availability can be overcome by adjusting routes and times depending on demand of new riders. With the increased ridership mass transit will have more money making it easier them to add more routes, more buses or subways, and more times in order to accommodate most. This will make commuting easier for employees and making it more attractive to employees if they do not have to wait as long for a bus.

A way to win over employees wary of public transportation is to educate them about the environmental and economical benefits. If they do not care about the environment they will certainly care about their pocket books. Point out gas savings, car saving, and time savings (they would not be stuck in rush hour traffic.)

What are the resources?

• What resources will we need to address this issue?

Money in order to provide transit passes to employees.
Influence will be needed in order for this bill to be passed. Supporters of mass transportation would be needed to explain the importance of this bill.
Awareness of the environmental and health impacts of driving are needed. People must be aware of the issue in order to change their behavior.

• Where and how can they be tapped?

Money will be coming from the Low Greenhouse Gas Transportation Fund
Influence will come from testimony of experts on the effects of driving on the environment. Law makers will need to be aware of the importance of lowering the amounts of pollution in our environment.

What is the history of this issue?

• What is the history of the issue in the community?

In many communities around the country there have been efforts in order to promote using public transportation to commute to work. One example can be found San Fransisco, California. Here, there has been a requirement instated for large corporations to promote, offer reduced or free mass transportation passes.

USCPA, U.S Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement has been created and signed by many mayors who pledge to reduce the amount of pollution that contributes to global warming withing their city. They are doing this by promoting mass transit and urging citixens to give up their SUVS.

• What past efforts were made to address it?

There have been efforts such USCPA, and the federal Commuter Checks Program, which is program designed to encourage alternative forms of transportation. Employees can apply for commuter checks to buy a bicycle to ride to work or a transit pass. These checks are tax free.

• What were the results?

the federal commuter checks program has been quite popular and the USCPA is still working towards their current goal of lowering the emissions with in their town.

Allies & Opponents

• Who would support this issue?

Environmental groups, mass transportation, some employees and corporations who would receive tax credits for supplying employees with transit passes.

• Who would oppose this issue?

Car manufacturers, oil and gas companies, some employees who do not want to take mass transit

• How can you involve allies and opponents in advocacy efforts? (What common ground can you share? How can you create a win-win for your allies and your opponents?)

Make it clear to car, oil and gas companies that their business will not suffer completely. People will still need to drive because mass transit can not take a person everywhere. People will still need cars. Also, not every buisness in America will qualify for a tax credit, so a share of their market would not even be phased by the passage of this bill.

If some employees do not want to take public transportation, suggest car pooling with co-workers who live near by. This still allows for less cars to be on the road and allows for the employee to feel like they are in control because they are driving their own car.

My Recommendation

Policy-makers should vote YES on the Green Routes to Work Act. It will help the United States take step towards a healthier environment which would lead to better health of Americans. In the process it may help boost certain areas of the economy, reduce noise and air pollution, and reduce rush hour traffice